![]() Then, for the office, people usually call the EF the "Divine Office", but the OF the "Liturgy of the Hours" (at least, this is the case with the secular versions). I might also add, don't refer to the Extraordinary Form merely as "Latin", because Latin is of course normative for the Ordinary Form as well. If you are secular: Antiphonale Romanum II (2009)Įxamples: I've seen it used by my diocesan cathedral Little officeslike the Little Office of Baltimore (LOB) and the more well-known Little Office of the Blessed Virgin Mary have been adapted for use by the laity or certain orders with simpler structures and less readings. If you are a Benedictine: Antiphonale Monasticum (2000's) The Divine Office compliments the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass as the public prayer life of the Church. ![]() In reality, most people would probably be using excerpts from this AR as found in the Liber Usualis, which is an esteemed and very useful anthology, otherwise some other AR-derivative book If you are secular: Antiphonale Romanum (1949/1960)Įxamples of users: say, the FSSP seminary, the Institute of Christ the King, or others devoted to the Extraordinary Form liturgies. If you are a Benedictine: Antiphonale Monasticum (1934)Įxamples of Monasteries using this book: Norcia, Le Barroux The Ordinary Form refers to using the current liturgical books, whereas the Extraordinary Form refers to doing things according to the books in effect in 1962. Are you clear on the difference between, whatever you call them, the Extraordinary Form versus the Ordinary Form?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |